The collapse of global markets is generally considered to be a bad thing, but I pride myself on being able to spot a silver lining.
However badly markets fare, we in the west are unlikely to slip into absolute poverty, we’re not going to starve. Our notion of poverty is a relative one, relative to those living around us, and so is our measure of wealth.
I count myself amongst the hapless winners in this global economic downturn. I own no stocks, I own no property, I have no assets to speak of, just my own human capital. From my perspective a
reduction in asset prices is a good thing. If the markets really tank I might even be able to afford a house.
In anticipation of a global recession petrol prices are falling, food prices are off their highs. Every time a jobless banker is forced to sell his Porsche I get a little richer, if only comparatively. Compared with Britain’s richest man, Lakshmi Mittal, who has lost £20bn in the past four months, I’m smelling of roses. My only concern (I concede it is a sizable one) is securing future employment.
The 3 billion people who live on less than $2.50 a day are also getting richer, compared with the global average; but then relative wealth is a hollow measurement when you’re living in absolute poverty.
November 13, 2008 at 10:51 am
[...] 13/11/08: Don’t despair, some would argue you can even benefit from the credit crunch. David Christopher blogs that a reduction in house prices can only be good for those hoping to get on the property [...]