<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News will outlive the newspaper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidmchristopher.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/news-will-outlive-the-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidmchristopher.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/news-will-outlive-the-paper/</link>
	<description>News, views and cultural reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iain Withers</title>
		<link>http://davidmchristopher.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/news-will-outlive-the-paper/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Withers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmchristopher.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-17</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that you describe the old media as a barrier to entry. Great point. I think they&#039;re also a barrier to innovation. The old catch-all model whereby every Fleet Street paper goes out and covers the same story is under strain, especially as resources are squeezed. More specialist models might be a better bet.

Also, I see what you mean about your blog&#039;s religious turn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that you describe the old media as a barrier to entry. Great point. I think they&#8217;re also a barrier to innovation. The old catch-all model whereby every Fleet Street paper goes out and covers the same story is under strain, especially as resources are squeezed. More specialist models might be a better bet.</p>
<p>Also, I see what you mean about your blog&#8217;s religious turn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelhaddon</title>
		<link>http://davidmchristopher.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/news-will-outlive-the-paper/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelhaddon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidmchristopher.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-10</guid>
		<description>&quot;The internet is changing the news business, but not the essential product, the written word.&quot;

That&#039;s part of the problem, news can no longer just be presented in one medium.  We have to find the best way of getting our journalism across to consumers - be it video, audio or text-based.

I agree that &quot;a few papers will go bust and others will consolidate, but newspapers will survive.&quot;  The question is in what form, surely not a printed one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The internet is changing the news business, but not the essential product, the written word.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s part of the problem, news can no longer just be presented in one medium.  We have to find the best way of getting our journalism across to consumers &#8211; be it video, audio or text-based.</p>
<p>I agree that &#8220;a few papers will go bust and others will consolidate, but newspapers will survive.&#8221;  The question is in what form, surely not a printed one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
